Tricks of Persuasion in the Presidential Election

A Review of
Win Bigly: Persuasion in a World Where Facts Don’t Matter
(Author: Scott Adams)

Scott Adams’ Win Bigly already feels a bit dated, given that the shock of the 2016 election is slowly fading. But the lessons that that election offered us must not be ignored or forgotten, and Adams’ perspective on it is useful.

Voters need to have a deeper understanding of persuasion: to recognize it when a politician is baiting their emotions, to be suspicious when fallacious logic is being employed. It’s not merely about civility, or that voters should stick only to facts, nor even yet that politicians and partisan media should have greater need to fear getting “caught.” Most of all, it is that today’s clutter of public bullshit eclipses even the possibility of serious public deliberation about issues.

How to Thwart Economic Snake-Oil Salesmen

A Review of
Advice and Dissent: Why America Suffers When Economics and Politics Collide
(Author: Alan S. Blinder)

Economist and Washington veteran Alan Blinder has come to understand very deeply the contrasts between economists and politicians. Economists are rational, correct, and naïve, while politicians cynically use economists to rationalize whatever they want to do.

Blinder is very clear-eyed about this, and eloquently describes today’s condition—so well that I’m obliged to include more quotations here than usual. But his is an extremely Washington-centric perspective, which I will comment upon later.

How to Coax Tea Party Citizens Away from Resentment

A review of Strangers in Their Own Land:
Anger and Mourning on the American Right
(Authors: Arlie Russell Hochschild)

Having the goal of creating a “bipartisan” online educational resource that non-degreed adults will want to visit, my intuition has been that ordinary conservatives will be warier than ordinary liberals. And that it often may not be effective to appeal to such conservatives with rational arguments, data, and expert opinion. This book tends to confirm my fears.

Via a huge number of interviews with (mostly) Tea Party conservatives in Louisiana from 2010 to 2014, sociologist Arlie Russell Hochschild put together the “deep story” that articulates how these citizens see the world and their place in it. In a nutshell, it revolves around the idea of “cutting in line”: they have been enduring and working for the American Dream, but if anything they’ve been backsliding, while other groups—minorities, civil servants, women, and so forth—have been cutting in line ahead of them. They don’t think anyone (including themselves) should be getting handouts, and they put the blame squarely on a bloated federal government that doesn’t share their values. Hochschild summarizes: